Legal Opinion

McWhorter v. The Procter & Gamble Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 28, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00806Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LORAINE MCWHORTER, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00806-AMO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendant. 11 12 13 Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company’s (“P&G”) motion to dismiss was heard 14 before this Court on November 7, 2024. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully 15 considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal 16 authority, the Court hereby GRANTS P&G’s motion, for the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API