Legal Opinion
State v. Jaroma
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 14, 1995No. 93-516PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The defendant, Alexander Jaroma, appeals the order of the Superior Court (.Hampsey, J.) denying his motion for a new trial brought pursuant to RSA 526:1 (1974). We affirm.
The Hillsborough County Grand Jury indicted the defendant in July 1984 on twenty-two counts of receiving stolen property. See RSA 637:7 (1986). Prior to trial, the defendant moved to suppress certain evidence. The trial court denied that motion. We affirmed the trial court’s ruling upon interlocutory review. See State v. Jaroma, 128 N.H. 423, 514 A.2d 1274 (1986).
In preparation for trial, the State and defense counsel…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. GravelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. BriandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. AnayaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EtienneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. FooteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. RayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.