Legal Opinion

State v. Foote

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 18, 2003No. 2000-532PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

The defendant, Charles Foote, appeals the denial of his motion to set aside his misdemeanor convictions, following a bench trial, for violating two protective orders. See RSA 173-B:8 (1994 & Supp. 1998) (amended 1999). He asserts that the Franklin District Court (Townley-Tilson, J.) erred by: (1) failing to conduct an on-the-record colloquy in connection with his jury trial waiver or require a personally executed waiver; and (2) concluding that his counsel’s written waiver of jury trial demonstrated that he had personally acted knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. We affirm.

The defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Bernard Wandick v. James A. Chrans & Neil HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Frese v. FormellaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  3. State v. OuelletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. State v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Hutton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API