Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Trickey

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1905No. Civil No. 871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Santa Cruz. George R: Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.

The complaint in this case alleges that Neville and Chapin were partners; that Neville died on January 3, 1900, and that Chapin, the surviving partner, having possession of the partnership assets, died five days thereafter, and before the partnership affairs were adjusted; that the plaintiff, Franklin (appellant in this court), duly qualified as administrator of Neville’s estate, and the defendant, Trickey, duly qualified as administrator of Chapin’s estate. The complaint further alleges that the partnership property came into the possession of the defendant, Trickey, as administrator of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Theller v. SuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Galbraith v. TracyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Mares v. MaresMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Irish v. BrannenArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Mosher v. LountArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. White v. PrahlMontana Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API