Legal Opinion

White v. Prahl

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1933No. 7,067PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This action was brought to recover on two promissory notes. At the conclusion of the evidence each party made a motion for a directed verdict.- Defendant’s motion was denied, and plaintiff’s granted.

The court made the following findings: That plaintiff and Amos Anderson, at and prior to the death of the latter on January 4, 1927, were carrying on a partnership business in the handling of livestock; that certain horses belonging to the partnership were sold to the defendant and the notes here sued upon were executed by him in payment therefor; that the notes were made payable to Amos Anderson,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mares v. MaresMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Krueger v. SpeithMontana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Franklin v. TrickeyArizona Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Link v. HaireMontana Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. FallMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Federal Land Bank v. GreenMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Gray v. MarrsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Thompson v. FlynnMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State Board of Equalization v. FallMontana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API