Legal Opinion
Mayo Clinic v. Mayo's Drug and Cosmetic, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 1962No. 38,380PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court which denied the motion of defendant for amended findings or, in the alternative, for a new trial.
On May 2, 1957, Mayo L. Priebe, Sr., and two others became incorporators of Mayo’s Drug and Cosmetic, Inc., defendant here. In October 1957 plaintiffs brought this suit to enjoin said defendant from the use of the name “Mayo” and all of its variants. After a hearing commencing November 25, 1957, on an order to show cause why a temporary injunction should not be issued, the trial court ordered a temporary injunction on June 14,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown Sheet Iron & Steel Co. v. Brown Steel Tank Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Howards Clothes, Inc. v. Howard Clothes Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Cornell University v. Messing Bakeries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Cornell University v. Messing Bakeries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Cole Chemical Co. v. Cole LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hammons Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Laser Mobile Home Transport, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Viking Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Viking Fire Protection Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Dutcher v. HarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Oklahoma District Council of the Assemblies of God of the State of Oklahoma, Inc. v. New Hope Assembly of God Church of Norman, Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Frederick Gash, Inc. v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972