Dutcher v. Harker
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUARK, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying injunctive relief to both parties in an unfair competition suit. The case involves the right to use the brand name “Dutcher-Williams,” the name “Dutcher” alone or in any combination, the labels of the (paint) product, including name, color, and design, advertising and displays, and, to some extent, the quality of the product. Contrary to the usual situation, the seller has sued the buyer; and the buyer has filed a counterclaim likewise praying for injunctive relief.
Plaintiff-appellant Charles Dutcher had been connected with…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Cleo Syrup Corporation v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- F. W. Fitch Co. v. Camille, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Thoreau v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wulfing v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jake C. Byers, Inc. v. J.B.C. InvestmentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Schnucks Twenty-Five, Inc. v. BettendorfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- South Side Plumbing Co. v. TiggesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hardin v. RayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.