Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Prater & Forrester

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 1922No. 13249PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The mere fact that in a contract between an owner and a broker, listing property for sale, use is made of the words “ to sell,” does not change the status of the agent thus employed from that of a broker to a sales agent, so as to render inoperative the provision of the Civil Code (1910), § 3587, that “the broker’s commissions are earned when, during the agency, he finds a purchaser ready, able, and willing to buy, and who actually offers to buy on the terms' stipulated by the owner.” It is furthermore true “ that where the purchaser presented by the broker is accepted by the vendor, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fenn v. Ware & OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Humphries & Jackson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Payne v. PonderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Odell v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Hyams v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Teague v. Adair Realty & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Busbin v. Suburban Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Adams Loan & Investment Co. v. Dolvin Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Wehunt v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Suburban Realty, Inc. v. BusbinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API