Legal Opinion

Hartgrove v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 14, 1949No. 40818PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a judgment upon verdict (nine jurors agreeing) for $10,000 in plaintiff's action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A., § 51 et seq. The injuries were alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff when he was working as a member of a work-train crew picking up loose rails and scrap along defendant's east-west track between Clarence and Monroe City.

Errors are assigned in submitting plaintiff's case to the jury, and in the instructions given; and in the trial judge's action in conferring with the foreman of the jury in chambers and in the absence of counsel for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Counts v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Davis v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Nance v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Guy v. ViethTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Brady v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API