Legal Opinion

Dean v. Gober

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1999No. S99A0691, S99X0692PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Chief Justice.

Prior to the initiation of the action leading to this appeal, Gober was arrested and prosecuted for possession of methamphetamine based on a “reverse sting” in which he bought an ounce of methamphetamine from an undercover officer. During the pendency of his prosecution, Gober filed an action for mandamus seeking an order requiring Dean, Chief of the Gwinnett County Police Department, to destroy the evidence on which Gober’s prosecution was premised. The legal basis Gober asserted for his petition was the requirement in OCGA § 16-13-49 (u) (1) that any forfeited…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turpin v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Beckham v. GallemoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  4. Baez v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Tamaroff v. CowenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. MAGISTRATE COURT DEKALB COUNTY v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Grier v. PeedSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Giraldo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Gober v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API