Legal Opinion

Baez v. Miller

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1996No. S95A1780PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

In this pro se mandamus action, appellant is the judgment-creditor in a civil case and appellee is the clerk of the trial court wherein appellant’s judgment was obtained. With regard to enforcement of his judgment in the civil case, appellant sought mandamus to compel appellee to issue an execution in accordance with OCGA § 9-13-10. The trial court found that, in fact, appellee had issued the execution and that appellant’s mandamus claim should, therefore, be denied as moot. It is from this order of the trial court that appellant appeals.

Appellant’s contention on appeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petkas v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merry v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Dean v. GoberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  4. In Re Estate of BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Bell v. RaffenspergerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API