Grier v. Peed
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
After being convicted of voluntary manslaughter, Barry Grier purported to file several pro se motions, despite the appointment of post-trial counsel. He subsequently brought this mandamus action against all three of the superior court judges in the circuit (Appellees), seeking to compel them to enter orders regarding those motions. They recused themselves, and the designated judge dismissed the application for mandamus, finding that Grier received the relief sought and that the issues are now moot. Grier appeals pro se from this order.
“Mandamus will not be granted when it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daker v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Baez v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Chandler v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Dean v. GoberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Schaefer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Titelman v. StedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Shaunesi Yvette Deberry-Melvin v. Jeffrey D. Hamby, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
- Titelman v. StedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003