Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Banker

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1984No. 83-634PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants-plaintiffs, Donald and Alde-ane Siegel, sought to obtain a judgment ordering specific performance of a purchase-and-sale agreement for their condominium. After the presentation of their case, appellee-defendant, Lawrence Banker, orally- moved for dismissal on the ground that appellants’ evidence failed to state a cause of action. The trial court granted the motion and judgment was entered in favor of appellee. Appellants now challenge the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing their claim. We affirm.

On December 24, 1982, appellants and appellee entered into a written purchase-…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John M. King, and v. Ben T. Stevenson, AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. Drazin v. American Oil Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Kasten Construction Co. v. Maple Ridge Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Soldano v. HolmesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Allard & Geary, Inc. v. FaroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aronoff v. Lenkin Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Capitalkeys, LLC v. Democratic Republic of CongoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Clay v. HansonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Elkins Manor Associates v. Eleanor Concrete Works, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Randall J. Marlowe v. Argentine Naval CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API