Legal Opinion
Randall J. Marlowe v. Argentine Naval Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 30, 1986No. 19-1248PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Randall Marlowe brings this diversity action for breach of contract against the Argentine Naval Commission. Following a bench trial, the district court granted judgment for the defendant. We affirm.
I
In 1982, plaintiff and defendant negotiated and signed a written contract, which provided that plaintiff would arrange for defendant to buy two planes for $1.5 million each from Servistan, a Panamanian corporation. The contract was executed in Washington, D.C. on September 27, 1982, and specified that its terms were governed by the laws of the District of Columbia. To cover the purchase…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. Joe R. Shelton, Sr., an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Double-E Sportswear Corp. v. Girard Trust Bank and X CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Siegel v. BankerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Hildreth Consulting Engineers v. Larry E. Knight, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Farm Equipment Store, Inc. v. White Farm Equipment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- PC Com, Inc. v. Proteon, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Radiation Systems, Inc. v. Amplicon, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.