Kasten Construction Co. v. Maple Ridge Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the Maple Ridge Construction Company (Maple Ridge), as buyer, is entitled to require the Kasten Construction Company (Kasten), as seller, to specifically perform a contract in which settlement for the sale of certain building lots was to have been made in sixty days but the time was not stipulated as being of the essence.
The contract of sale, dated December 4, 1964, provided for the sale and purchase of a tract of land in Section 4 of the Maple Ridge Subdivision in Anne Arundel County consisting of thirty-four “finished” lots 1 designated as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Soehnlein v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Chapman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Doering v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Scarlett v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Jaeger v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Schneider v. Dumbarton Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Drazin v. American Oil Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.