Legal Opinion

Tedesco v. Home Savings Bancorp, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2017No. DA 17-0157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Matthew Tedesco began working in March 2008 for Home Savings of America (HSOA), a federally chartered savings and loan association. After a few months on the job, Tedesco signed an employment agreement containing a provision that required the parties to submit any disputes to binding arbitration. HSOA terminated Tedesco’s employment in 2011. Tedesco sued HSOA, its CEO and Board Chair Dirk Adams, and Home Savings Bancorp (HSBC), which owned all of HSOA’s stock. Tedesco alleged wrongful discharge, breach of contract, and fraud. The District Court ordered the parties to proceed to binding…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Nitro-Lift Technologies, L. L. C. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Iwen v. U.S. West DirectMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Buck v. Billings Montana Chevrolet, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lenz v. FSC SecuritiesMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Peavy v. Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Sutey Oil v. Monroe's High CountryMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Weeden Construction v. SimbeckMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Butte v. Butte PoliceMontana Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API