Legal Opinion
Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Brandt
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 22, 1997No. 97-2123PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a claim arising under the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962. The issue before us, however, involves less the intricacies of RICO law and more § 15 of the National' Association of Securities Dealers Code of Arbitration (the “NASD Code”). That section provides that no dispute, claim or controversy is eligible for arbitration where six years have elapsed from the “occurrence or event giving rise to the act or the dispute, claim or controversy.” This appeal turns on the definition of the quoted language.
We hold that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simmons v. CongerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Painewebber Incorporated v. H. William HofmannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Teper v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Kenneth Osler v. Pamela WareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of ClearwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Salomon Smith Barney Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, MDCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Boim v. Fulton County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Arthur D. Rutherford v. James v. Crosby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. W. James Pickett, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.