Salomon Smith Barney Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, MD
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
The central issue in this appeal concerns the propriety of a district court’s review of the timeliness of claims sought to be arbitrated pursuant to the National Association of Securities Dealers Code of Arbitration. Because the extent of a court’s review is clearly articulated in both Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cohen, 62 F.3d 381 (11th Cir.1995), and Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc., v. Brandt, 131 F.3d 1001 (11th Cir.1997), we hold that the district court properly analyzed whether the alleged claims were timely for purposes of arbitration; accordingly, we…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Barger v. City of Cartersville, GACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Birmingham Steel Corp. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Dupwe v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Kipperman v. Onex Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.