Legal Opinion
McCormick v. Badham
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 7, 1914PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from Birmingham City Court. Heard before Hon. C. W. Ferguson. Assumpsit by A. H. McCormick against Henry Bad-ham. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.
On July 7, 1904, H. L. Badham, appellee, and A. H. McCormick, appellant (plaintiff below) executed a contract, of which the following were the substantial terms: “Witnesseth, that A. H. McCormick, of Birmingham, Ala., and the Dorchester Lumber Company, Badham, S. C., have entered into a certain contract as to his connection with and services to said Dorchester Lumber Company, to which contract this agreement is made a part.
“It is understood and agreed by and between H. L. Badham and A. H. 'McCormick that, as part of said contract, H. L. Badham will sell to A. H. McCormick $4,500.00 of stock…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Loud v. Pomona Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Fulenwider v. RowanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Nesbitt v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- McCormick v. BadhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Lauderdale Power Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Abbeville Live Stock Co. v. WaldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Bell, Rogers & Zemurray Bros. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.