Lauderdale Power Co. v. Perry
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; C. P. Almon, Judge. Bill by the Lauderdale Power Company against E. M. Perry. Decree of dismissal, and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The purpose of the bill is to secure specific performance of a contract, and damages for its breach.
[1] We will not discuss assignments of error relating to the introduction of evidence, where not argued. Georgia Cotton Co. v. Lee, 196 Ala. 599, 603, 72 South. 158; Johnson v. State, 152 Ala. 93, 44 South. 671; Republic I. & S. Co. v. Quinton, 194 Ala. 126, 69 South. 604; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Benson, 159 Ala. 254, 264, 273, 48 South. 712.
The original contract of July 3, 1914, related to a sale of the lands in question; and there were several modifications and extensions thereof, to and including…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ide v. LeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1890
- Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. QuintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Jones v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Porter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- McGuire v. AndreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.