Legal Opinion

School Dist. No. 23 of Okfuskee County v. Commissioners of the Land Office

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1933No. 23163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

An action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by the plaintiffs in error against the Commissioners of the Land Office of Oklahoma and the individual officers composing said board as set forth in the statement of this opinion, for a writ of mandamus to compel said defendants in error to pay to the plaintiffs in error and other common. school districts in the state of Oklahoma certain moneys collected for the leasing of school and other public lands for oil and gas mining purposes. The parties herein appear in the same order as they appeared in the trial court and will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SnyderWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Work v. United States Ex Rel. MosierSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Attorney General v. Hatcher Treas.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Parker v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Wright v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Toomey v. State Board of Land CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State ex rel. Williamson v. Commissioners of Land Office of the StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. WardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Jensen v. DinehartUtah Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API