Labenne v. Kaufman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
E. Kaufman, defendant in error, recovered judgment upon the verdict of a jury against A. Labenne, plaintiff in error. From the judgment and an order overruling a motion for a new trial, the latter appeals. The parties will be referred to as they appeared' below.
Plaintiffs first cause of action sought judgment on a promissory note in the amount of $936, signed by defendant and payable to the West Tulsa State Bank. The note was endorsed by the plaintiff and by him paid after default by defendant. The note - was secured by a chattel mortgage upon certain oil well equipment.
Plaintiff’s second…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. NorvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Megert v. BaumanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- A & a Cab Operating Co. v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Bock v. SypertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.