Legal Opinion

Labenne v. Kaufman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1939No. 28634PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

E. Kaufman, defendant in error, recovered judgment upon the verdict of a jury against A. Labenne, plaintiff in error. From the judgment and an order overruling a motion for a new trial, the latter appeals. The parties will be referred to as they appeared' below.

Plaintiffs first cause of action sought judgment on a promissory note in the amount of $936, signed by defendant and payable to the West Tulsa State Bank. The note was endorsed by the plaintiff and by him paid after default by defendant. The note - was secured by a chattel mortgage upon certain oil well equipment.

Plaintiff’s second…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. NorvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Megert v. BaumanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. A & a Cab Operating Co. v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Bock v. SypertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API