Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Norvell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 1952No. 34671PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.

The defendant, Magnolia Petroleum Company, appeals from a verdict and judgment against it in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $1,000, for damage to surface rights in connection with the development of an oil and gas lease. The damages claimed arise from the development of a single oil and gas lease covering an 80-acre tract. Five wells were drilled on the tract within a period of a few months and the pits of an earlier well were changed during this same period. One of the plaintiffs in the present action was one of the original lessors and the other plaintiffs are heirs of the other…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stone v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Union Transportation Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sunray DX Oil Company v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Harper-Turner Oil Company v. BridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Stephens v. DraperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Nichols v. Burk Royalty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. City of Tahlequah v. Lake Region Electric, Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API