Legal Opinion

Fritz v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided April 18, 2000No. 97-2323PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINBERG, Judge:

Before this Court is the appellant’s December 7, 1998, application for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA), and his December 21, 1999, supplemental EAJA application. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the 1998 EAJA application and deny the 1999 supplemental EAJA application.

I. Relevant Background

The underlying facts are set forth in our prior opinion in this case. Fritz v. West, 13 Vet.App. 190 (1999). Briefly, the pertinent facts follow: The appellant, veteran James F. Fritz, appealed pro se a September…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Stillwell v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  3. Cook v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  4. Shaw v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  5. Sandoval v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James F. Fritz, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Fritz v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
  3. Fritz v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
  4. James F. Fritz v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
  5. Carpenter v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API