Carpenter v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1DissentKramer, Chief Judge
I cannot concur in the majority opinion because it fails to address several requisite issues. Although I am not in agreement with several matters in Judge Steinberg’s *93separate opinion, I note that he and I are in substantial agreement as to many of the matters discussed in this opinion.
First, the majority holds that the Court has jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a) to review the reasonableness of a fee agreement under 38 U.S.C. § 7263(d) that the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) has reviewed sua sponte under 38 U.S.C. § 5904(c)(2). Ante at 72. Pursuant to the Veterans’ Judicial…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hugh D. Cox v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Charles W. Bazalo, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Cullens v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Bruce Tyler Wick. Bruce Tyler Wick, Movant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In re the Fee Agreement of CoxUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.