Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carpenter v. Principi

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided June 21, 2001No. 99-0794Published

1DissentKramer, Chief Judge

I cannot concur in the majority opinion because it fails to address several requisite issues. Although I am not in agreement with several matters in Judge Steinberg’s *93separate opinion, I note that he and I are in substantial agreement as to many of the matters discussed in this opinion.

First, the majority holds that the Court has jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a) to review the reasonableness of a fee agreement under 38 U.S.C. § 7263(d) that the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) has reviewed sua sponte under 38 U.S.C. § 5904(c)(2). Ante at 72. Pursuant to the Veterans’ Judicial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hugh D. Cox v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Charles W. Bazalo, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Cullens v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
  4. In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Bruce Tyler Wick. Bruce Tyler Wick, Movant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. In re the Fee Agreement of CoxUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API