Northern Paiute Nation v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
In this Indian Claims case, the Walker River Tribe, one of six organized tribes of the Northern Paiute Nation, seeks damages based on defendant’s alleged failure to honor its obligation to provide an irrigation system sufficient to irrigate 10,-000 acres of land on the Walker River Reservation in Nevada.1 The court has before it defendant’s motion for summary judgment asserting that this irrigation claim by the Walker River Tribe is outside the jurisdiction of this court because it is an aggregate of individual Indian claims as opposed to a unitary tribal claim. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Choctaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Wolfchild v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Northern Paiute Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.