Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 9, 1985No. 22-HPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
On September 18, 1985, plaintiff White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona (“plaintiff”) moved pursuant to RUSCC 59(a) for reconsideration of the order entered on September 4, 1985, and for argument. Defendant has opposed. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The September 4, 1985 order denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims in this litigation concerning erosion of reservation range lands, maximization of potential income from range lands, and suppression of water resources or rights under the Winters Doctrine. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Keene Corp. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Frito-Lay of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. CañasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Keeton Corrections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.