Ferguson v. Pekin Plow Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. (1) Here is a proposition which in onr judgment states the equity of this ease, to wit: That the Grain Drill, Minneapolis Company and Deuscher Company have such right to share in these proceeds as Ferguson had, and no other; their equity to share is founded upon the equitable right that they have as against Ferguson; they enter the equitable arena, basing their rights upon the relation that exists between themselves and Ferguson, and can of…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. (1) Here is a proposition which in onr judgment states the equity of this ease, to wit: That the Grain Drill, Minneapolis Company and Deuscher Company have such right to share in these proceeds as Ferguson had, and no other; their equity to share is founded upon the equitable right that they have as against Ferguson; they enter the equitable arena, basing their rights upon the relation that exists between themselves and Ferguson, and can of course have.no greater right as against the other three insured companies than Ferguson possessed, and Ferguson as a…
1Opinion of the CourtG-antt, P. J.
— This is a suit in equity begun by the filing of a petition, in the nature of a bill of inter-pleader, by Gl. J. Ferguson, one of the respondents against the two appellant companies and all the other respondents. The petition was verified by respondent Ferguson, and the prayer thereof was that the court make an order requiring the defendants and each of them to interplead so that the court might adjudge to whom certain funds held by him belonged, and order distribution thereof in accordance with the rights of the parties. Upon the petition of plaintiff, and the answer and cross petitions of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waring v. . the Indemnity Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Stillwell v. . StaplesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Prsdt. and Directors of Balto. Fire Ins. Co. v. LoneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Hough v. President of the People's Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Lucas v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Monsanto Chemical Co. v. American Bitumuls Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Bank v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Graham v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- American Record Pressing Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.