Legal Opinion

Monsanto Chemical Co. v. American Bitumuls Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 9, 1952No. 42955PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

249 S.W.2d 428 (1952)

MONSANTO CHEMICAL CO.

v.

AMERICAN BITUMULS CO. et al.

No. 42955.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1.

June 9, 1952.

Franklin E. Reagan, Sievers, Reagan & Schwartz, St. Louis, for appellant.

Goodbar & Ferriss, Henry T. Ferriss, St. Louis, for respondent.

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

Action to recover $18,361.33 for alleged negligence of defendants resulting in fire by which chemicals belonging to plaintiff, Monsanto Chemical Company (hereinafter referred to as "Monsanto"), were destroyed. Defendants by separate answers averred plaintiff's loss was covered by insurance by which…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  3. Hall-Scott Motor Car Co. v. Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  4. Dillon v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Buckey v. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rock Springs Realty, Inc. v. WaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Beechwoods Flying Service, Inc. v. Al Hamilton Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Federal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. Monsanto Co. v. Alden Leeds, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Aetna Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Craftwall of Idaho, Inc., an Idaho Corporation, D/B/A Heritage CabinetsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API