Legal Opinion
Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
Defendant relies chiefly upon its demurrer to tbe evidence and motion for dismissal or for judgment as of nonsuit, made first at tbe close of plaintiffs’ evidence, and renewed at tbe close of all tbe evidence. Tbe exception noted at tbe close of all tbe evidence is tbe only one wbicb may be considered on appeal, tbe first having been waived by-the defendant. Harper v. Supply Co., 184 N. C., 204.
Tbe essential facts, admitted by the parties or sufficiently established on tbe bearing, are as follows:
1. Joe M. Burlison owned a tract of land in Buncombe County with certain buildings and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hastings v. . Westchester Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Eddy v. London Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Biggs v. Insurance Co. (North Carolina Home)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Modlin v. Atlantic Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. CrutchfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Union Trust Co. v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance v. GarrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Arnold Goodman v. Quaker, City Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958