Falkenhagen v. Counties of Yellow Medicine & Lac Qui Parle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Paul J. Falkenhagen, deeming himself aggrieved by the order of the court determining that his lands in Lac qui Parle would be benefited by the construction of Judicial Ditch No. 2 in Yellow Medicine and Lac qui Parle counties, demanded a jury trial. The matter was heard by Daly, J., and a jury which returned a verdict that the land was benefited $6,100 and damaged $1,600. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, demandant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The appellant is the owner of a half section of land which is crossed ■by Judicial Ditch No. 2 of Yellow Medicine and Lac qui Parle, counties. Being dissatisfied with the amount of benefits and damages assessed to this land in the order establishing the ditch, he demanded a jury trial and had the benefits and damages reassessed by a jury. Thereafter he made a motion for a new trial and this appeal is from the order denying his motion.
1. It appears that when the original report of the. viewers came before the court for consideration, the court resubmitted the entire matter of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cunningham v. County of Big StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Rooney v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Dodge v. County of MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- In Re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Roseau CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- In re County Ditch No. 33Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Northern States Power Co. v. BarnardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.