Legal Opinion

Citizens Co. v. Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, C. J., concurring opinion; HOKE, J., concurring opinion; STACY and ADAMS, JJ., concurring in the opinion of the Court and the concurring opinion of HOKE, J. Civil action. The facts essential for a decision of this case are as follows:

The plaintiff, a corporation, brought an action against the above-named defendants, Asheville Typographical Union, No. 263, and the other defendants personally. The return on the summons by the sheriff is as follows: "Served 30 October, 1923, by delivering a true and correct copy of the within summons and restraining order to W. J. Beacham, secretary and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Marx & Haas Jeans Clothing Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Hyatt v. Dehart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Marshall v. Commissioners of Stanly CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Yellow Cab Co. v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Reno v. Second Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Keith Theatre Inc. v. VachonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  3. Venus Lodge No. 62 v. Acme Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Stafford v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Youngblood v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API