Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Clark Consulting, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 28, 2008No. 07 C 6868PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.

The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) filed a complaint against Clark Consulting, Inc. (“Clark”) alleging breach of contract, and alternatively, unjust enrichment. (R. 20, First Am. Compl. (“FAC”).) Before this Court is Clark’s motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (R. 30, Clark’s Mot. to Dismiss.) For the foregoing reasons, the motion is denied.

RELEVANT FACTS 1

Prudential is a life insurance company that issues and administers insurance contracts,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. HPI Health Care Services, Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Anita Christensen and Robert Alty v. County of Boone, Illinois, and Edward KriegerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. E & E HAULING, INC.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Steven J. Holman and Karen L. Holman v. State of Indiana and Indiana Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Santangelo v. Comcast Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Duffy v. TICKETRESERVE, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  4. Petrakopoulou v. DHR International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  5. Khatib v. Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. (In re Chicago Newspaper Liquidation Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API