State v. Wooten
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
The only assignment of error brought forward and argued in defendant’s brief is that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to arrest the judgment. Defendant contends that the warrant is fatally defective for the reason that it does not show that King’s Department Store, 264 By-Pass, Greenville, N. C., is a natural person or a legal entity capable of owning property; that shoplifting is a “descendent” of the crime of larceny, therefore, the rule applicable to larceny applies to shoplifting.
Defendant relies on State v. Biller, 252 N.C. 783, 114 S.E. 2d 659 (1960), and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973