Legal Opinion

Lantsberry v. Tilley Lamp Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1971No. Nos. 70-392 and 70-393PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteausbaugh, J.

Appellees claim that since the Court of Appeals ordered the Common Pleas Court to overrule the motions to quash, that under our prior decision (14 Ohio St. 2d 41), “there should be no question that the law of Ohio is that a motion to quash is not a final appealable order.”

A final order which may be reviewed, affirmed, modified.*or reversed, with or without retrial, is “an order affecting a substantial right in an action which in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment, an order affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding or upon a summary application in an action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lantsberry v. Tilley Lamp Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Renfroe v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. National City Commercial Capital Corp. v. AAAA At Your Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Huntsman v. Aultman Hosp., 2006 Ca 00331 (5-27-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. City of Riverside v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API