McKinley v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, Judge.
{¶ 1} The Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation appeals the decision of the Washington County Court of Common Pleas, holding R.C. 4123.93 and 4123.931 unconstitutional. The appellant contends that the statutes do not violate appellee Jeff McKinley’s interest in his tort recovery, effect an impermissible taking, deprive the appellee of his due process rights, or violate the Equal Protection Clause. Because we determine that the current versions of R.C. 4123.93 and 4123.931 were drafted to comply with the holding in Holeton v. Crouse Cartage (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 115, 748 N.E.2d…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Smith v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Adkins v. Bratcher, 07ca55 (1-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Anderson v. SchmidtOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.