Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Randall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 27, 1928No. 19148PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.
Hugh A. Randall, the respondent herein, filed with the State Industrial Commission a claim for eompensa-tion against Luther Hamilton and the Southern Surety Company for an injury occurring on October 9, 1927. The claimant states the facts in his own testimony, and a portion of his statement is as follows:
“I went to work for Mr. Hamilton, Luther Hamilton, at Pauls Valley, on Priday following this accident. We worked the first day on setting concrete forms in the city of Britton; the next day we run a concrete mixer; I was assigned this concrete mixer by Mr. Hamilton; that was on Saturday. I…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hogan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Harris v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Moore & Gleason v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hillestad v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Farmers Gin Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- El Reno Broom Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Leonhardt Enterprises v. HousemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.