Legal Opinion
Moore & Gleason v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 1924No. 14597PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JONES, C.
This is an appeal from an order of the State Industrial Commission wherein J. M. Taylor, respondent herein, was awarded the sum of $94.60 for injuries received and medical bills incurred while, as he alleges, he was in the employ of Moore and Gleason, petitioners herein. The only controversy which appears from the record is that of whether or not J. M. Taylor was an employe .of Moore and Gleason, or of M. J. Beal. The commission found him to be an employe of Moore and Gleason and awarded damages on that theory. The facts are, as we gather them from the record, that Moore…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hogan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Producers' Lumber Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Harris v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- West v. MadanskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Farmers Gin Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Shepard v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Hamilton v. RandallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.