Coffey v. Stephens
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Spencer, J.:
This is an action for damages sustained in an automobile accident. Trial to a jury was conducted on the issue of whether defendant was estopped from relying on the bar of the two-year statute of limitations. At the close of all of the evidence, defendant moved for a directed verdict. Ruling was reserved and the matter was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict that plaintiff was not entitled to rely on the doctrine of equitable estoppel for the reason that “[substantial evidence was not provided that the plaintiff was lulled into a false sense of security.” Following a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rex v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Bowen v. WesterhausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Frevele v. McAloonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Kunstman v. MirizziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Sexsmith v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & EberhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Robinson v. ShahCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Zurn Constructors, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.