Legal Opinion

Coffey v. Stephens

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 31, 1979No. 50,188PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spencer, J.:

This is an action for damages sustained in an automobile accident. Trial to a jury was conducted on the issue of whether defendant was estopped from relying on the bar of the two-year statute of limitations. At the close of all of the evidence, defendant moved for a directed verdict. Ruling was reserved and the matter was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict that plaintiff was not entitled to rely on the doctrine of equitable estoppel for the reason that “[substantial evidence was not provided that the plaintiff was lulled into a false sense of security.” Following a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rex v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Bowen v. WesterhausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Frevele v. McAloonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. Kunstman v. MirizziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Sexsmith v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  2. Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & EberhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Robinson v. ShahCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  4. Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  5. Zurn Constructors, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API