Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Co. v. Enebak
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 21, 1928No. 27,101PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant the Maryland Casualty Company.
Respondent was the surety of S. G. Enebak in a statutory bond required in the letting to him by the county of Polk, Minnesota, of a contract for the construction of Job No. 2603, State Aid Road No. 1, in said county. In such construction plaintiff furnished Enebak gasolene, lubricating oil, and greases to the amount of $1,432.64, of which $914.02 remains unpaid. Had respondent been served with the written notice prescribed by G. S. 1923, § 9705, there could be no question but that plaintiff should have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. Architectural Decorating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Hagstrom v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Ilg Electric Ventilating Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Carbic Manufacturing Co. v. Western Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ceco Steel Products Corp. v. TapagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Mineral Resources, Inc. v. Mahnomen Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012