Legal Opinion
Curran v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 9, 1992No. 14190PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether an excess personal liability policy that provides uninsured motorist coverage1 is subject to the equality requirement of General Statutes § 38-175c.2 The plaintiff, Col*659leen Curran, claims that, pursuant to § 38-175c (a) (2), an excess personal liability policy issued to the plaintiff’s father by the defendant, Aetna Casualty and Sur*660ety Company (Aetna), must provide uninsured motorist coverage equal to the liability limits of the policy. The trial court determined that because the excess personal liability policy provided that the insured maintain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Southern American Ins. Co. v. DobsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Duriak v. Globe American Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Katherine Mazzaferro, Joanne Malec, and Ruth Glahn v. Rli Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Kent v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. Kelly J. Sayles, Administratrix of the Estate of Bonnie E. Sayles and Andrew SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- EMPIRE FIRE & MARINE INS. v. LangDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Agency Rent-A-Car v. Itt Hartford Acc., No. Cv-93-0530573-S (Oct. 23, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.