Legal Opinion

Ryoti v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1985No. Docket 78512PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for wrongful termination of employment. Plaintiff Ronald Ryoti worked for defendant Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., and was registered with the New York Stock Exchange. To become registered with the exchange, plaintiff Ronald Ryoti had to sign an arbitration agreement which stated, in part, that any dispute between members of the exchange must be submitted to an arbitration panel which is selected by the exchange. While plaintiff Ronald Ryoti signed this agreement at work, he had the opportunity to take it home and review it. He also took classes in which this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Suchodolski v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Morris v. MetriyakoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Brown v. SiangMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Connie Thurman John Thurman v. Daimlerchrysler, Inc., James Stanford Pittman, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
  5. James v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API