Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Flores

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 2006No. 167 MDA 2006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

¶ 1 This appeal follows the judgment of sentence entered after Appellant’s convictions for two counts of criminal trespass and one count of theft by deception. Appellant’s attorney has filed a petition to withdraw as counsel, alleging that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has also filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), presenting issues that might arguably support the appeal.

¶ 2 The issues in the Anders brief are: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions for criminal trespass…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. GoodwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API