Commonwealth v. Flores
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
COLVILLE, J.:
¶ 1 This appeal follows the judgment of sentence entered after Appellant’s convictions for two counts of criminal trespass and one count of theft by deception. Appellant’s attorney has filed a petition to withdraw as counsel, alleging that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has also filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), presenting issues that might arguably support the appeal.
¶ 2 The issues in the Anders brief are: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions for criminal trespass…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. HalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. GoodwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.