Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Drysdale

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1939No. File No. 8196PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Predicated upon the theory that the odors and flies engendered by keeping eight horses in their barn in the midst of a residential district of Rapid City, South Dakota, thirty-four feet from a rental house owned by plaintiff, unreasonably interfered with the enjoyment of plaintiff’s property and was therefore a nuisance, the trial court entered its decree enjoining such use by defendants.

The issues are presented on appeal under an assumption indulged by both parties that the term nuisance, as defined by our law, includes consequences arising from the otherwise lawful use of property. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Hyde v. M., D. & P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Brede v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Fisher v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Barnes v. HathornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Mitchell v. City of RoswellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Breckweg v. KnochenmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Greer v. City of LennoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. City of Aberdeen v. WellmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API