Legal Opinion

City of Aberdeen v. Wellman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1984No. 14249PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

Allan and Arlene Wellman (appellants) appeal a judgment which declared their business use of real property a public nui-*205sanee and enjoined certain activities. We affirm.

Appellants own three lots in a subdivision less than one mile north of the Aberdeen city limits. The area has been platted but is largely undeveloped. The land north of the disputed area is unplatted farm ground. The subdivision is bounded on the south by a well-travelled, hard surface road. Across that road, and to the south, is a junior high school and a tennis court/swimming pool complex.

In 1973,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hilde v. FloodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Langerman v. LangermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Greer v. City of LennoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hersrud v. HersrudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Town of Colton v. South Dakota Cent. Land Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. GarvinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Prairie Hills Water & Development Co. v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Union County v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Town of Winfred v. SchollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. City of Aberdeen v. WellmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API