Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Hathorn

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 21 opinions

On Exceptions, from Nisi Prius, Dickerson, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtKent, J.

The facts, which the plaintiff proved or offered to prove, on which the presiding Judge ordered a non-suit, are substantially as follows : — that the husband of the defendant, Mary Hathorn, in 1846, built a tomb on the premises now owned by her — and, within 44 feet from the west side of the plaintiff’s house, and the windows of his parlor, sitting-room and dining-room, all of which rooms were on that side of his house; that dead bodies were from time to time deposited in said tomb, until about the year 1856, when nine such bodies were in the tomb; that such an effluvia was emitted from them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fish v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Catlin v. ValentineNew York Court of Chancery · 1842

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Densmore v. Evergreen Camp No. 147Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Jack Lewis, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Cunningham v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Everett v. PaschallWashington Supreme Court · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API