Legal Opinion

United States v. City of Philadelphia

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1980No. 80-1348PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

The primary question in this appeal is whether the United- States has implied authority to sue a city and its officials for an injunction against violations of the fourteenth amendment rights of individuals. The government argues that both the criminal provisions of the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1870, 18 U.S.C. §§ 242 and 241, and the fourteenth amendment itself give rise to an implied right of action. We also must decide whether the government has stated a claim for relief under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Arar v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Frank's Gmc Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Don Karns v. Kathleen ShanahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Richard Dewey v. The University of New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API