State v. Curry
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶ 1 After unsuccessfully representing himself at trial, Jerome Curry Jr. appealed his drug convictions to the Court of Appeals, challenging the trial court's decision to allow Curry to represent himself. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the trial court should not have granted Curry's request to proceed pro se. The State of Washington now appeals to this court. To determine whether the trial court abused its discretion when it granted Curry's request for self-representation, we must determine whether Curry's request to represent himself was unequivocal. We hold that it was. We…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Daniel Scott Moody, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Rush v. JeffreysDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
- State Of Washington v. Bryan Johnathon ParentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Christina Shara KaestnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.