State v. Henderson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 In criminal trials, juries are given the option of convicting defendants of lesser included offenses when warranted by the evidence. Giving juries this option is crucial to the integrity of our criminal justice system because when defendants are charged with only one crime, juries must either convict them of that crime or let them go free. In some cases, that will create a risk that the jury will convict the defendant despite having reasonable doubts. As Justice William Brennan explained, “Where one of the elements of the offense charged remains in doubt, but the defendant is plainly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Lovett James ChambersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Charles BlufordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Marque Deandre FlukerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.