Legal Opinion
Martin Marietta Corp. v. New Jersey National Bank
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 15, 1981No. Civ. 75-644PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
I
BACKGROUND
This diversity case involves a dispute over 62,443 tons of sand. The plaintiff, Martin Marietta Corporation, purchased about 136,-657 tons of sand during the last three months of 1973 from Hollander Sand Associates, (“Hollander”) 1 taking delivery on 59,189 tons and stockpiling the rest at Hollander’s facilities in Woodmansie, New Jersey. 2 The stockpiled sand, as inventory of Hollander, was subject to a security interest held by the defendant New Jersey National Bank (“Bank”). Throughout the fall of 1974, Hollander had trouble meeting its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- R. E. B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Winkler v. Hartford Acc. and Ind. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Guido v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Sternberg v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. New Jersey National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bergen, Johnson & Olson v. Verco Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1985
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. New Jersey National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Martin Marietta Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Maryland v. New Jersey National Bank, a National Banking Association, and Plaintiff-On-Counterclaim v. Tamburelli Properties, Inc., Additional Defendant-On-Counterclaim, New Jersey National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981